HEOR
Evidence that survives the reviewer's first question.
Your team is the one the payer pushes back on. Knowledgeable gives HEOR a grounded workspace where indirect treatment comparisons, matching-adjusted indirect comparisons, cost-effectiveness models and value dossiers stay traceable from claim to source, so the question you get back is technical, not 'where did this number come from?'
"Plan an MAIC vs. standard of care in 3L+ mCRPC for NICE submission, with feasibility flagged."
The work that finally lands the way you scoped it.
Evidence that comes with its source
Every figure, every competing treatment, every endpoint is linked to the publication, slide deck or CSR it came from. Audit and review collapse to minutes.
indirect treatment comparison and matching-adjusted indirect comparison scoping in a morning
Competing treatments, populations and feasibility flags surfaced before your statistician opens R. Decide what's defensible before you've spent six weeks on it.
Models the reviewer can actually open
Cost-effectiveness and budget-impact narratives written in the language of NICE, IQWiG and HAS, not internal jargon.
Reuse across the portfolio
Methods, competing treatment sets and assumption libraries compound across assets and indications. Asset two inherits asset one's work.
Make HEOR the team that defends the price.
Talk to an HEOR specialistBuilt so medical and legal review, biostats and InfoSec all sign off.
Every assumption traceable. Every export reproducible. EU AI Act aligned, SSO + MFA, audit log on every keystroke.