Pipeline prioritisation
Portfolio calls grounded in evidence, not in vibes.
Knowledgeable scores every asset and indication against competitor pipeline, HTA precedent, addressable population and pricing corridor, so the portfolio review committee is debating the trade-offs, not the data.
Watch it run on your work.
Where this fits in your workflow.
Knowledgeable scores every asset and indication against competitor pipeline, HTA precedent, addressable population and pricing corridor, so the portfolio review committee is debating the trade-offs, not the data.
Most teams running Portfolio today juggle a stack of search tools, PDF readers and consultancy slides, then spend the back half of the project reconciling claims to sources. Knowledgeable collapses that into one defensible workflow: portfolio calls grounded in evidence, not in vibes.
The work runs against your literature, trial registries, HTA precedent, label and SmPC, with every sentence pinpoint-cited so your senior reviewer opens a document that's already at QC.
- 1Scope & competing treatment locked
- 2Evidence pulled & graded
- 3Draft built with citations
- 4QC pass against framework
The work that finally lands the way you scoped it.
Asset and indication scoring
Every asset scored across every credible indication, not just the favourite ones.
Competitor-aware
Pipeline density, likely first-to-market, label race. Built into the score.
Access-aware
HTA precedent and pricing corridor in the score, so the prioritisation reflects what you can actually monetise.
Defensible at the board
Every input sourced, every assumption logged. The portfolio review committee debates the call, not the data.
Make the portfolio call you can defend.
Audit your portfolioAudit-trailed at the asset level.
Sources, assumptions and scoring logic captured. Reproducible at every review.